Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1350

reference
590-tree-1
name
1350
tree-preservation-order

undefined

590-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.041847 50.865561)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.041805 50.865556,-1.041807 50.865565,-1.041813 50.865572,-1.041822 50.865578,-1.041834 50.865582,-1.041847 50.865584,-1.041872 50.865579,-1.041882 50.865573,-1.041888 50.865565,-1.041890 50.865557,-1.041888 50.865549,-1.041882 50.865541,-1.041873 50.865535,-1.041861 50.865531,-1.041848 50.865530,-1.041835 50.865531,-1.041813 50.865540,-1.041807 50.865548,-1.041805 50.865556)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL